You have no items in your shopping cart.
Close
Search
Filters

Persian Period Jerusalem and Yehud

A Rejoinder


The author responds to criticism against his prior publications, when his conclusions were based foremost on the relevant archaeological findings. It is a debate between methodologies used by archaeology and the assumptions of textual analysis within biblical scholarship.
Publisher: Gorgias Press LLC
Availability: In stock
SKU (ISBN): 978-1-4632-0125-8
  • *
Publication Status: In Print
Series: Analecta Gorgiana1078
Publication Date: Feb 13,2012
Interior Color: Black
Trim Size: 6 x 9
Page Count: 18
Languages: English
ISBN: 978-1-4632-0125-8
$33.00
Ship to
*
*
Shipping Method
Name
Estimated Delivery
Price
No shipping options

The author responds to criticism against his prior publications on Jerusalem and Nehemiah's wall and the List of Returnees in Ezra and Nehemiah. Those summaries are provided, noting the size of Persian period Jerusalem, the lack of archaeological evidence for identifying a city wall in Nehemiah's period, that details in Nehemiah describe the construction of the First Wall in the Hasmonean period, and that some attributions in the List of Returnees were probably written in the second century. It is a debate between methodologies used by archaeologists and the assumptions of textual analysis within biblical scholarship. Finkelstein structures his response as it is directed separately to his critics Zevit, Mazar, Barkay, and Lipschits.

The author responds to criticism against his prior publications on Jerusalem and Nehemiah's wall and the List of Returnees in Ezra and Nehemiah. Those summaries are provided, noting the size of Persian period Jerusalem, the lack of archaeological evidence for identifying a city wall in Nehemiah's period, that details in Nehemiah describe the construction of the First Wall in the Hasmonean period, and that some attributions in the List of Returnees were probably written in the second century. It is a debate between methodologies used by archaeologists and the assumptions of textual analysis within biblical scholarship. Finkelstein structures his response as it is directed separately to his critics Zevit, Mazar, Barkay, and Lipschits.

Write your own review
  • Only registered users can write reviews
*
*
Bad
Excellent
*
*
*
*
Contributor

IsraelFinkelstein

  • PERSIAN PERIOD JERUSALEM AND YEHUD: A REJOINDER (page 5)
Customers who bought this item also bought
ImageFromGFF

John the Solitary on the Soul

In this treatise, John the Solitary (ca. 390) enters into a dialogue with two disciples who have come past the beginning stage of the spiritual life and have brought him their struggle against the passions in the life of the inner person (barnâšâ gawwâyâ). John’s description of the life of the soul is outlined here in a framework of the stages of the spiritual life. Included is his analysis of the passions, showing very little if any Evagrian influence. The Dialogue on the Soul is a difficult text. It is hoped that this Syriac-English presentation will enable others to take the discussion forward. John’s genial thought merits this.
$61.00
Picture of Cultic Spiritualization

Cultic Spiritualization

Throughout the history of research on the Dead Sea Scrolls, the investigation of religious sacrifice has been neglected. This book examines the views of sacrifice in the non-biblical sectarian Dead Sea Scrolls, through exploration of the historical and ideological development of the movement related to the scrolls (the DSS movement), particularly from the vantagepoint of the movement's later offshoot group known as the Qumran community
$110.95
Picture of The Lord God of Gods

The Lord God of Gods

The investigation of this book into early Jewish experiences of God begins with calls to discard any categorical and definitional approaches to the literature of early Judaism, and several enduring preconceptions about its mysticism and theology (particularly the relegation of its mysticism to particular texts and themes, and the molding of its theology in the image of medieval and post-medieval Jewish and Christian monotheisms). With this abandonment, the symbolic language of early Jewish texts gives sharper contours to a pre-formal theology, a theology in which God and divinity are more subjects of experience and recognition than of propositions. This clarity leads the investigation to the conclusion that early Judaism is thoroughly mystical and experiences a theology which is neither polytheistic, nor monotheistic, but deificational: there is only one divine selfhood, the divinity of “God,” but he shares his selfhood with “gods,” to varying degrees and always at his discretion. With some important differentiations which are also introduced here, this theology undergirds almost the entirety of early Judaism—the Bible, post-biblical texts, and even classical rabbinic literature. The greatest development over time is only that the boundaries between God and gods become at once clearer and less rigid.
$114.95